Gilmore Girls star Scott Patterson opens up about his emotions regarding an episode that objectified him. Created by Marvelous Ms. Maisel showrunner Amy Sherman-Palladino, the consolation comedy-drama set within the fictional city of Stars Hollow, Connecticut, ran for seven seasons from 2000 to 2007. The sequence was revived for a particular four-part mini-series by Netflix in 2016, known as Gilmore Girls: A Year within the Life, which supplied closure on all of the present’s vital relationships after the unique sequence’ cancellation. Telling the story of single mom Lorelai (Lauren Graham) and her teen daughter Rory (Alexis Bledel), the sequence follows the ups and downs of their relationship in addition to their normal struggles in life and love.

SCREENRANT VIDEO OF THE DAY

Patterson performed diner proprietor Luke Danes within the common sequence, a staple determine of the small city and will-they gained’t-they love curiosity of protagonist Lorelai Gilmore. Luke, together with Rory’s love interest and his nephew Jess, was a fan-favorite of the sequence as a consequence of his position as a lovable grump and his loyalty to Lorelai, Jess, and Rory. Though Luke and Lorelai finally made issues work and bought collectively for good on the final second, there have been loads of instances main as much as their union when it appeared like issues would not work out for the couple. And whereas they shared a really relatable love story, some elements of their journey collectively have not aged nicely.


Related: Gilmore Girls: Why Luke Didn’t Attend Sookie’s Wedding

During an episode of his Gilmore Girls podcast I Am All In with Scott Patterson, the actor notes that he felt very uncomfortable with the premise of season 3, episode 19, “Keg! Max!”. In the episode, Lorelai’s buddy Sookie by chance touches Luke’s bottom, and the ladies proceed to speak about his butt for a lot of the episode. After reflecting on the expertise, Patterson shares his emotions about that day on set. See what he needed to say under:

“I realized it wasn’t OK, and it didn’t make me feel comfortable at all. It made me feel really embarrassed, actually. It is infuriating to be treated that way — it is infuriating — because you’re being treated like an object. It’s disturbing, and it’s disgusting, and I had to endure that through that entire scene and many takes. It was all about the butt, the butt, the butt, the butt. When we weren’t filming, we were sitting down — people were still talking about the butt, the butt, the butt. It was the most disturbing time I have ever spent on that set, and I couldn’t wait for that day to be over. It’s as disgusting for women to objectify men as it is for men to objectify women, and it’s as harmful. Just because it was 2003 doesn’t mean it was OK. It’s never OK, and I didn’t feel comfortable doing it, and it pissed me off. And I never said anything, so I was angry at myself for never saying anything. But I had this job, and I didn’t want to make waves and all that.”

According to Patterson, the ‘butt episode’ was a nasty day throughout for him, on-screen and off-screen. The expertise he’s referring to of feeling uncomfortable however not eager to ‘make waves,’ is as unlucky as it’s common for actors. Especially in 2003, when the ‘Me Too’ motion was nonetheless years forward, the dominant tradition in place was one which punished actors for talking out about feeling objectified or uncomfortable, so it is smart that he hasn’t felt snug opening up in regards to the expertise till now. Patterson’s bravery in talking out about this uncomfortable incident shouldn’t be understated.


Though Patterson largely notes his appreciation for his time on Gilmore Girls and has even chosen to revisit these years together with his podcast, this particular expertise clearly stands out as a darkish instances for him whereas on set. His podcast continues to be exploring the early seasons of the sequence, so maybe he can have extra insights into his emotions about his character’s later storylines because the podcast goes on. While the storyline he refers to was handed off as comedy in 2003, it was by no means a laughing matter and positively would not be accepted at this time. Though issues have began to alter for the higher by way of female and male objectification in movie and tv, there’s a lengthy approach to go, and listening to tales from actors of all genders about their experiences is the one method ahead.


Source: I Am All In with Scott Patterson podcast

Source link