This piece is a few debate, and debates can get contentious, so let’s begin with the half we will all agree on. Everything on this subsequent paragraph is indisputably true, and no affordable individual would argue with even one phrase of it.

The NHL’s standings system sucks. It’s ridiculous {that a} skilled sports activities league offers out extra factors for some video games than others, particularly when these factors are awarded in a manner that encourages groups to play it protected and preserve it shut as a substitute of making an attempt to win outright. The league says they do that to maintain the playoff races nearer, however the system very clearly doesn’t actually do that, and is de facto about inflating everybody’s data in order that the GMs who vote on these things can appear to be they’re having success they haven’t earned. Maybe the system made some small quantity of sense in 1999 when the league was overrun with ties, however the shootout ended that concern. Today, these additional factors are dumb and terrible and embarrassing, a symptom of a league that’s extra desirous about coddling the egos of the previous boys membership in cost than on delivering a product that is smart. The finest time to alter the system was 17 years in the past. The second-best time is true now.

Everyone nodding alongside? Of course you’re. Now comes the contentious half.

What precisely is that additional level the NHL offers out for some video games and never others?

No actually, which one is it? When a recreation ends in regulation, the profitable group will get two factors within the standings and the loser will get nothing, for a complete of two. But if the sport goes to extra time, it magically turns into price three factors, with the winner nonetheless getting two and the loser now getting one. A brand new one has been created.



Source link