More than a month after a US court docket introduced its verdict in favour of Johnny Depp in his defamation trial in opposition to ex-wife Amber Heard, she has filed a discover to attraction in opposition to the judgement that directed her to pay $10.35 million to him. She was held accountable for defaming Johnny via her 2018 op-ed in The Washington Post wherein she described herself as a ‘public figure representing domestic abuse’. Also learn: Amber Heard faced ‘organised campaign of targeted harassment’ during defamation trial against Johnny Depp: report

Amber’s authorized workforce submitted the attraction discover to the Virginia Court of Appeals, in search of to overturn the decrease court docket’s June 1 ruling, reported Reuters. The company quoted her spokesperson as saying, “We believe the court made errors that prevented a just and fair verdict consistent with the First Amendment. We are therefore appealing the verdict.”

According to Variety, Johnny’s spokesperson mentioned that they’re assured the court docket will uphold the June 1 verdict. “The jury listened to the extensive evidence presented during the six-week trial and came to a clear and unanimous verdict that the defendant herself defamed Mr. Depp, in multiple instances. We remain confident in our case and that this verdict will stand,” his spokesperson said according to the portal.

On June 1, the jury ordered Amber to pay Johnny $10.35 million in damages. The jury also awarded Amber $2 million on her counterclaim. Recently, Amber’s attorneys asked the judge in the case to move aside the judgement and declare a mistrial over the mistaken identity of one of the jurors. But judge Penny Azcarate ruled that there was ‘no evidence of fraud or wrongdoing’ by the juror and that the jury’s verdict should stand.

Johnny and Amber had made various allegations against each other during their high-profile defamation trial, which made headlines across the globe. There were also alleged hate campaigns against Amber on social media, which a recent report claimed to be an “organised campaign of widespread targeted harassment”.

Close Story

Source link