Amber Heard says Johnny Depp received defamation trial because of ‘testimony from paid workers and randos’

Actor Johnny Depp received the defamation trial in opposition to his ex-wife Amber Heard on June 1. In her first interview since she misplaced the case to Johnny, Amber stated that the trial wasn’t truthful. She stated Johnny’s witnesses have been ‘randos’ and ‘paid employees’. Also Read: Amber Heard on receiving ‘hate and vitriol’ during trial against Johnny Depp: ‘You cannot tell me this has been fair’

Amber stated the “hate and vitriol” she suffered on social media throughout her libel trial in opposition to Johnny was not “fair,” however insisted in an interview launched Monday she didn’t blame the jury for largely siding along with her ex-husband. After a six-week-long trial, a Virginia jury awarded Johnny greater than $10 million in damages for defamation, in distinction to only $2 million for Amber who had counter-sued.

“I don’t presume the average person should know those things. And so I don’t take it personally. But even somebody who is sure I’m deserving of all this hate and vitriol, even if you think that I’m lying, you still couldn’t look me in the eye and tell me that you think on social media there’s been a fair representation,” Amber advised NBC in her first main interview because the verdict.

She added, “How could they make a judgment? How could they not come to that conclusion?” Amber stated. “They had sat in those seats and heard over three weeks of non-stop, relentless testimony from paid employees and towards the end of the trial, randos, as I say.”

The trial, live-streamed to hundreds of thousands, featured lurid and intimate particulars concerning the celebrities’ non-public lives, and Amber was focused by numerous social media posts and web memes all through.

Johnny had sued Amber for $50 million claiming she defamed him when she referred to as herself a sufferer of home abuse in a Washington Post op-ed she wrote in 2018. She counter-sued him for $100 million. Both the actors had alleged that the opposite individual abused them all through their short-lived marriage from 2015-17. Johnny had misplaced a earlier libel case within the UK he had filed in opposition to the tabloid The Sun, which referred to as him a “wife-beater”. In that case, the choose had dominated there was ample proof to again up the allegation.